Samyak choudhary in Eye_openers 10 minutes

Rebels - Who they are and why you need them?

Do I really need to tell you who these conceited, egotistical, mutinous troublemakers with no regard for rules, regulations or authority are?

(Considering the rising unrest in this world, I can only assume that the population of rebels is on a rise. Or probably it’s just that like attracts like and without my knowledge, I have recently been pushed into the ‘Rebel Worldcup’!)

Who are rebels? Think Arya Stark, Captain Jack Sparrow, Harry Potter, Hans Solo and Dr. House.

Jack Sparrow

Rebels resist authority, control, tradition and conformity inorder to promote or preserve their personal autonomy. They are drawn towards seeking aesthetic perfection and their orientation is highly individualistic. Noteworthiness, rarity, distinctiveness, individuality and/or the unusual, idiosyncratic or eccentric are the characters rebels value most highly in themselves and others.

These are idealists who have high standards and seek excellence in whatever they do. They believe that what is perfect but unavailable or unattainable is infinitely more desirable than what is flawed but possible or achievable. When you look at their lives, you always find them reaching for the unreachable star.

A typical idealist rebel’s dialogue -

“And maybe there’s no peace in this world, for us or for anyone else, I don’t know. But I do know that, as long as we live, we must remain true to ourselves.” - Spartacus (Kirk Douglas) in Spartacus

Known for their insolent blunt remarks and crude straighforwardness, it’s not, always, that they lack tact. They just don’t believe in wearing any ‘masks’. For them, flinching, even momentarily, from who they are is a sign of cowardice and coming across as a coward is unbearably harrowing. No, they don’t filter their thoughts, temper their strong emotions or cover their dissenting attitude. They don’t hide their idiosyncracies either. They flout fickleness and call your shit, shit.

Seen as epitomes of courage and fearlessness, it’s not that they aren’t afraid or insecure. However, their fear of not succeeding exceeds their fear of failing. This fear is the foundation of their ability to think on their feet and act spontaneously, even when the risks are high. With the confidence to think for themselves and the courage to live what they believe in, they wage a constant battle against indoctrination and mind control; refusing to be programmed by the ‘values’ imposed by other generations and by the super “robots” in politics, economics, science, and religion.

Sloane captured Kanan, Star Wars

Enough deification of these difficult to get along with mutineering menaces. Getting to why do you need them (especially if you are someone leading a team, project or organization)?

“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” - George Bernard Shaw

A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step and a transformation of human understanding can begin with one thought and one rebel. Every improvement in the human condition has come from someone pushing against the tide and speaking out, no matter what the consequences.

Okay, so you realized that you need to improve - your project, your product, your business, maybe yourself. But who can help you perceive what and where can be improved?

Friends

If you truly want change then friends might be the worst people to resort to for counsel. They often agree on thing in order to avoid argument. They cover up unpleasant qualities so as to not offend each other. Since honesty rarely strengthens friendship, you can never expect your friends to be honest and upfront with you about your frailties. Friends often say that they are a fan of your personal style, adore your art, love your music, envy your taste in clothes, are confident about your future success and see coherence your designs and plans - maybe they mean it, often they don’t.

“The only sin which we never forgive in each other is difference of opinion.” - Ralph Waldo Emerson

In the organizational context, inability to tolerate difference in opinions leads to groupthink - the tendency to seek consensus instead of fostering dissent. Groupthink is the enemy of sustainable progress; people feel pressured to conform to the dominant, default views instead of championing diversity of thought. Noticeable flaws go unnoticed and this leads to future crash and failure, which often cannot be recovered from.

Devil's Advocate

Rebels are true devil’s advocate. They practice brutal, nonhierarchical honesty. They thrive on the process of shredding arguments and beliefs and letting the ribbons drift in the wind for all to see!

Opposing viewpoints can often come across as impractical. However, even when opposing viewpoint is flawed, the very act of opposing can be imensely valuable. It stimulates divergent attention and thought. Dissenting opinions are useful even when they’re wrong. Consequently, even when wrong, rebels contribute to the detection of novel solutions and decisions that, on balance, are qualitatively better.

People often have a tendency to seek counsel from “experts” when they realize there is a need for change but some unidentified area of improvement. However, experts can be invariably as stuck in their ways as anyone else. They know their domain inside out for sure, to the letter in fact sometimes, but that’s not necessarily a good thing. Because it invites constraint, lack of creative thinking, rigidity. Knowledge and experience have a tendency to harden into dogma and blind the possessor to seeing new ways of doing things.

Another problem with experts, is their reputation of being ‘experts’. Having built a reputation as an ‘expert’, experts feel a need to defend their reputation. This makes them averse to taking the risk of trying new ways. Sticking to the old tried and tested ways of doing things becomes the safer but often a catostrophic choice.

Expert

It’s not the experts and experiences, but the rule-benders and rule-breakers who are more tuned into the art of the possible. Who better placed in finding gaps to fill than someone who takes immense fun in spotting workarounds and back doors in systems and processes?

Also, unlike experts, rebels have few reputational concerns. (Those who have, have the concern of not coming across as a dumb conformist which only forces them to bring in more dissenting viewpoints to save their identity). Even when told they can’t do something because the company structure says so, they still push forward and (if required) ask for forgiveness later.

In the personal context, not your teachers and parents, who are addicted to habits and ways of the past generation, but your overly critical and arrogantly blunt friend who can acquiant you with your flaws and push you into improving them.

House Md

Now, I am not disregarding the need of experts. Experts are vital. They are the ones who push projects, products and companies forward. However, rebels are the initiators of change. They are the ones who identify problems (and mind you, identifying problems and voicing them is in itself a challenge). Experts are best suited for helping build solutions to identified problems.

We need both - the “shapers” and the “movers”. The “shapers” are independent thinkers: curious, non-conforming, and rebellious. The “movers” are power horses: hardworking, experienced and methodical. Without shapers, the movers will keep us running on a treadmill. Without movers, shapers take us on a random walk.

Standing on stage in front of a captive audience, a technology icon pulled a new device out of his pocket. It was so much smaller than competing products that no one in the room could believe his eyes. The founder’s flair for theatrical product launches wasn’t the only source of his fame. He was known for his singular creative vision, a passion for blending science and art, an obsession with design and quality, and a deep disdain for market research. “We give people products they do not even know they want,” he remarked after introducing a revolutionary gadget that … The man urged people to think different. He led his company to greatness and redefined multiple industries, only to be unceremoniously forced out by his own board of directors, and then watch the empire he created start to crumble before his eyes.

(As much as the above paragraph seems to describe Steve Jobs, the visionary was actually one of Jobs’s heroes: Edwin Land, the founder of Polaroid and inventor of the instant camera.)

What appals me is polarity in reception the two receive from society. While the “movers” of the world are well appreciated, most “shapers” are tagged as unacceptable troublemakers. While the conformists pushing existing systems forward are cheered for, the non-conformists finding faults in old ways of doing things stared at and their essence overlooked. Great companies like Polaroid, Virgin Records, and Kodak have fallen into failure abyss became of becoming insular and shutting down dissenting opinions; yet we fail to learn the necessity of diversity of thought, contradiction and open arguments.

Sure, there are immense problems in working with or being around rebellious folks. True that they cause unrest, disintegrate teams, and subject those around to mental agony. But can we not accept that everyone has a special niche to occupy in this world and embrace rebels as who they are - conceited, egotistical, mutinous troublemakers with no regard for rules, regulations or authority?